Now I'll add the inability to raise and lower, only tilt, the display.
Past gripes include the SD card slot which doesn't support UHS-II, all the connectors on the back - I'm sure I've scratched the metal around the USB connectors by blindly groping in the vicinity - and how dated it looks with the wide display bezels. The iMac is still functional, in the context of current 27-inch all-in-one designs, but my complaints are starting to mount. And since the prices haven't changed while the innards have, the base 27-inch configuration is a good value, if an uninspiring one. The iMac continues to be a fine system that runs fast given its components thanks to Mac OS. We'll still love you if you put on a few inches, Apple, especially if it enables something wondrous. There's no victory in squeezing a size 8 body into a pair of size 6 jeans, except for your vanity. But some miracles don't need to be worked. It's crammed newer and newer (meaning hotter and hotter) components into the tiny space behind the iMac's screen without having the systems explode into flames - I really didn't think it could pull off the same trick with the iMac Pro. To be fair, Apple's been working miracles behind that well-worn look. Maybe Oprah should design the next iMac? (I'm actually worried about sending that idea out into the universe.) It's possible, even probable, that Apple doesn't really care about that arm of its business when it can bask in the reflected glow of entertainment celeberati. Meanwhile the design of its larger computing hardware - MacBooks and iMacs - hasn't significantly changed in years and we're still waiting for a functional replacement for the trash can Mac Pro.
Imac pro vs imac 27 2018 how to#
The company couldn't figure out how to bring a charging mat to market because of its dysfunctional obsession with a specific, thin-uber-alles design aesthetic.
0 kommentar(er)
